For some time now, this newsletter has been a space for questioning societal narratives, exploring how we teach children about the world, and encouraging independent thought.
As I continue shaping its direction, I’ve been reflecting on the name—how it represents the heart of what I write about and the clarity I hope to bring to these discussions.
That’s why I’m considering a name change.
Attracting Unwanted Debate
The challenge with the current name is that it tends to set certain expectations—ones that might not fully align with the discussions I wish to foster. While the foundation of my observations remains rooted in exploring natural law and direct experience, the name has sometimes attracted debates I’d rather not prioritize—arguments based on rigid textbook science rather than open and direct observation.
A name change could help shift a focus on the guiding principles behind my writing:
🔹 Seeing the world as it is
🔹 Shifting the lens on society’s teachings
🔹 Exploring truth in plain sight
I want this Substack to be about reveling in the beauty of this world—through observation, curiosity, and a deeper understanding of natural order. Just as important, I explore how we nurture young minds to be independent thinkers who trust their senses and question falsified narratives presented to them.
I’d love to hear from you. What kind of name do you think best reflects the themes and ideas explored here? I have a few in mind, but your thoughts matter.
-
Share Your Thoughts
Let me know what you think.
I think it sounds great.